fic recs with vid and book covers
Jun. 7th, 2009 11:35 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I realized I'm terrible with words, so I started making book covers for the fics I enjoy as a form of feedback. I also made a little vidlet for one as well.
FIC RECS:
FIC RECS:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
no subject
Date: 2009-06-08 03:51 am (UTC)& hee, i've read that trek fic, kid!spock is the cutest thing.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-08 04:04 am (UTC)I'm terrible at knowing how to feedback someone. I usually throw out a million adjectives.
Little Spock was so cute in that fic.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-08 05:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-08 05:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-08 05:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-08 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-08 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-08 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-09 06:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-09 07:05 am (UTC)I think you commented anonymously so that I can't I have no idea where you're coming with that comment and you obviously don't want me to know because you don't want your name attached to it. Lack of content? Really? It's a 30 second vidlet I made as a thank you and rec for a friend's fic. Did you read the fic? If you want to talk about the content of the vid, then you should read the fic and tell me how the vidlet lacked content. I will use as many effects as I see fit in a vid and I do not see the need, nor have the desire, to explain my reasoning to anyone else. Unless I want to do so.
In case you forgot, DIAF.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-09 07:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-09 07:28 am (UTC)What don't I understand about vidding? Enlighten me. Is it "the basics" of vidding? What do you think "the basics" of vidding are and why do you think making experimental vids requires me to know them? Is there an outline that's been agreed upon that contains the "rules" of vidding? I don't care about making a vid using these basics of which you speak.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-09 09:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-09 04:40 pm (UTC)If you think those things are missing from my vids, then fine. I know they're not because I have themes and meanings behind all of my vids. I just don't go around screaming them from rooftops and making a big deal about the nature of my vids. If you get it, you get it. If you don't, then you don't. I'm not going to sit there and spit words at the viewer to explain what I did.
I don't care about traditional techniques. I will vid what I want to vid and I resent the implication that I don't understand vidding. I think you don't understand vidding, at least the vidding I do.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-09 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-09 09:17 pm (UTC)WTF?
1. anonymous commenting SUCKS, it's rude & absolutely cowardly! (unless it's on a kink meme or something)
2. i don't think you're qualified to 'help' anyone to be a better vidder - your criticism has no substance WHATSOEVER & since you don't show your own work for comparison you're obviously not in any position to judge
3. wow, you sound really arrogant. diaf, yes please!
+ although you're obviously too scared to show your own stuff, i would still be interested in some of the vids YOU think are good. cause imho (and i know many agree with me here) kiki's vids are some of the best & most inspired around, and it makes me wonder what YOU like & which vidders you think have mastered the basics of vidding at all.
/rant.
(sorry about that kiki, but comments like this make fucking ANGRY)
no subject
Date: 2009-06-09 10:43 pm (UTC)Not to mention that you're a fucking joke for not even having the courage to say who you are. How can any judge the value of your opinion about vidding if you don't have anything to back it off. Be it your own vids or your opinion on other vids, I don't care. But stand for your own goddamn opinions.
(also, if you really wanted to help, you would have gone through all of her vids and seen she's perfectly able to do amazing 'normal' content-filled videos (even though for anyone with half a brain, there's an infinite amount of content to gather from her experiental vid).)
no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 07:21 am (UTC)I won't read your comments in-depth. I don't have to because I'm interested in helping you comment, not be a troll. You don't comprehend commenting and you hide behind anonymity.
As you don't seem to be able to see the structure, storytelling, meaning, themes and very precise pacing in Kiki's vids, I recommend a remedial course in cinematography ("Avant-garde", "Experimental", "Ground-breaking", "Imaginative", recommended reading: "Cinematography: The Creative Use of Reality.").
I don't think you comprehend critique at all from your comments. The basics of critique are understanding the subject and using traditional techniques - like politeness, coherency and, you know, signing your name - to illustrate your point.
You're still putting the stupid in place of understanding.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-09 07:13 am (UTC)Did you DIAF yet?
no subject
Date: 2009-06-09 06:44 pm (UTC)"The traditional techniques you use to show your theme," by the way, doesn't answer what "the basics of vidding" are in any way. Nor do I see WHY vidding can't be experimental and encompass numerous styles, unless suddenly we're going to go around burning all visual art that fucks with form and perspective because it's "ignoring the basics".
Or saying a good trailer should mean you shouldn't have to see the movie.
But wait, I'm responding to you like you aren't some giant anonymous wanker.
It's damn clear this was a gift for a friend, not a forum for nakedly aggressive anonymous bitching. Your post here is really, really fucking rude.
Not to mention I categorically disagree with your criticisms.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-09 11:13 pm (UTC)Also, anon commenting is beyond pathetic. If your intent was truly to help
no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 03:30 am (UTC)Also, anon posting = weak.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-09 11:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 07:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 12:37 am (UTC)(PS. I completely disagree with the anon above. I think there should be more experiments with vidding. I hope you don't take that person to heart.)
no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 07:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 05:07 am (UTC)Kiki's videos are extremely different from my own. But even if I can't always relate to her style, I can appreciate that she HAS her own style and creates videos that are unique and in her own voice. Experimental, whether in fanvids or commercial products, has never really been "my thing" (though I've done a couple in my time). But whether it's something that I love or not, that doesn't make it any less valid as an art form. One style is not better than the other. Clearly, you simply don't understand the basic concept of "experimental art".
Kiki, you did the right thing with your DIAF approach. You can't really take people like that seriously...ugh.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 05:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 05:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 07:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 07:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-15 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-16 04:40 pm (UTC)